From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brundige

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 22, 1974
43 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

February 22, 1974

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — Witmer, J.P., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Despite the fact that the defendant was 17 years old and a "slow" learner, unable to read or write, the record amply demonstrates that he was of sufficient intelligence and was possessed of enough experience to comprehend the meaning of the questions which the police asked him and to respond to them. Further, the police afforded this defendant's parents and sister an opportunity to accompany defendant to Police Headquarters (see People v. Townsend, 33 N.Y.2d 37). Under all the circumstances, the statement which defendant gave to the police was voluntary and based upon a knowing and intelligent waiver of his rights ( People v. Stephen J.B., 23 N.Y.2d 611; People v. Hocking, 15 N.Y.2d 973).


Summaries of

People v. Brundige

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 22, 1974
43 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Brundige

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LESTER ARTHUR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Matthews

he totality of the circumstances, which includes the defendant's limited mental capacity as but one factor…

People v. Bowers

" "The avowed purpose of the Miranda rules is to restrict `custodial interrogation' which the Supreme Court…