From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We reject defendant's claim that the trial court erred in denying defense counsel's motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to prove a prima facie case, and we note that defendant's guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming evidence. We also note that it was not error for the trial court to deny defendant's request for a missing witness charge, since the witness in question, Officer Mazelli, was then under indictment for burglary and was not under the control of the People. In any event there is no showing that Mazelli's testimony would have been other than cumulative ( see, People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 132-133; People v. Dillard, 96 A.D.2d 112, 115). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brando

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Brando

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK BRANDO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Band

A missing witness charge should be given where it is shown "that the uncalled witness is knowledgeable about…

Funderbird-Day v. Artuz

Given those circumstances, calling Detective Nieves as a witness may not have even been possible. See People…