From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barrera

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2016
885 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151282. COA No. 324831.

09-29-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. John Joseph BARRERA, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Saginaw County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall specifically address whether, pursuant to People v. Thompson, 488 Mich. 888, 788 N.W.2d 677 (2010) and People v. Spanke, 254 Mich.App. 642, 658 N.W.2d 504 (2003), Offense Variable 8, MCL 777.38, should not have been scored in this case where the movement was “incidental” to the offense of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. See also People v. Hardy, 494 Mich. 430, 442, 835 N.W.2d 340 (2013) (“[A]bsent an express prohibition, courts may consider conduct inherent in a crime when scoring offense variables.”).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.


Summaries of

People v. Barrera

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2016
885 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Barrera

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. John Joseph…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 29, 2016

Citations

885 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. 2016)

Citing Cases

People v. Barrera

We directed the Saginaw County Prosecutor to respond to defendant's application and specifically to address…