From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bangert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1968
22 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1968

Decided June 14, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE F.X. McINERNEY, J.

William W. Esseks and Marcia Z. Hefter for appellant.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney ( John Copertino of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and matter remitted to the County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The judgment should be reversed and the case remitted to the County Court for a hearing to determine whether the defendant was competent at the time of sentencing (Code Crim. Pro., § 658 et seq.). Defendant's history of mental illness, as indicated by the presentence report, was such that the sentencing court was bound to make some inquiry into defendant's mental condition at the time of sentencing, whether or not counsel raised the issue. ( People v. Boundy, 10 N.Y.2d 518; People v. Sprague, 11 N.Y.2d 951.)

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.


Summaries of

People v. Bangert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1968
22 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Bangert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD BANGERT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 14, 1968

Citations

22 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1968)
292 N.Y.S.2d 900
239 N.E.2d 644

Citing Cases

People v. Gensler

The litany of cases relied upon by the dissent do not support a result different from the one we reach on…

People v. Tortorici

"It has long been accepted that a person whose mental condition is such that he lacks the capacity to…