From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 2005
15 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2001-01719.

February 14, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered February 21, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Goldstein, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People failed to prove his identity as the shooter by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's identity as the shooter beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), without merit, or do not require reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 2005
15 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Ayala

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OSCAR AYALA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 439

Citing Cases

State v. Hernandez

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see…

People v. Reyes

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see…