From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arata

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1930
254 N.Y. 565 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued June 5, 1930

Decided July 8, 1930

Appeal from the Court of General Sessions of New York County.

Leo H. Klugherz, Joseph D. Edelson, Samuel Felman and Alexander I. Rorke for appellant.

Thomas C.T. Crain, District Attorney ( Robert C. Taylor of counsel), for respondent.


The affidavits proving or tending to prove that contradictory statements were made by the witness Woodbury, while not sufficient in themselves to require a new trial, were, none the less, of such importance that the cause of justice would be promoted by causing Woodbury to be produced as a witness and subjected to the test of cross-examination.

Following the practice in People v. Shilitano ( 215 N.Y. 715), the determination of the appeal will be withheld until the fall session of the court to the end that an opportunity may be given to the defendant to renew his motions for a new trial and an opportunity given to the trial judge to require the production of witnesses before him.


Summaries of

People v. Arata

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1930
254 N.Y. 565 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

People v. Arata

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER ARATA, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 8, 1930

Citations

254 N.Y. 565 (N.Y. 1930)
173 N.E. 868

Citing Cases

State v. Saba

There is plenty of authority in law for the method of procedure which I propose in this case. Here are some…

People v. Winkler

Under the corresponding provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (§ 465, subd. 7), it was said in an early…