From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Andrias, J.).


Defendant's claim that the indictment was duplicitous is unpreserved for review as a matter of law, defendant having failed to make a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment or to object to the submission of the count to the jury (People v Iannone, 45 N.Y.2d 589, 600), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. If we were to reach the issue, we would find that defendant was not prejudiced by a charge that was more favorable to him.

We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Anders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Anders

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK ANDERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

People v. Fisher

The prosecutor properly commented on this evidence during summation ( People v Cole, 216 A.D.2d 128, 129).…

Jones v. Duncan

Jones was required to raise his sufficiency of the evidence and duplicative indictment claims before the…