From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 1996
223 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 16, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.).


The trial court appropriately exercised its discretion in precluding proposed alibi testimony, upon finding that there was no good cause shown for failure to file a timely notice of alibi pursuant to CPL 250.20 (1), and that the prosecution had established that late notice deprived it of an appropriate opportunity to secure and investigate necessary records and arrange for expert witness testimony to refute the proposed testimony ( see, People v Caputo, 175 A.D.2d 290, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1126).

In light of the absence of a further record that might have been developed had an appropriate motion been made pursuant to CPL 440.10 ( People v Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998, 1000), the uncertain value of the proposed alibi testimony, and defense counsel's vigorous pursuit of a misidentification defense, it cannot be concluded on the existing record that trial counsel's failure to file a timely notice of alibi deprived defendant of the effective assistance of counsel ( People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

The trial court's denial of defendant's application for a continuance to call a police witness who was plainly unavailable and would be for the foreseeable future was an appropriate exercise of discretion ( Matter of Anthony M., 63 N.Y.2d 270, 283). Defendant wished to call the police witness for the purpose of introducing a complaint report she prepared, but the report was received in evidence by stipulation in any event.

As defendant offered summation argument based on the content of the report entered into evidence through the stipulation, the prosecutor was entitled to respond. The trial court sustained defendant's objection to the prosecutor's comment that suggested a stipulation was entitled to less weight than the testimony of a live witness and instructed the jury to disregard that argument. It is presumed that the jurors understood and followed the instruction ( People v Davis, 58 N.Y.2d 1102, 1104).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 1996
223 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Alvarez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MANUEL ALVAREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 331

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

Supreme Court properly precluded defendant's alibi witnesses from testifying because defense counsel failed…

People v. Delarosa

While I agree with the defendant's claim that the Supreme Court erred in denying the motion as procedurally…