From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Allen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 898 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued May 2, 1980

Decided June 10, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, THEODORE DACHENHAUSEN, J.

Stewart E. Sterk for appellant.

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Lois A. Cullen and Gerald D. Reilly of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice MILTON MOLLEN at the Appellate Division. In addition we would note that we do not agree with the defendant that every error which improperly curtails a defendant's right to cross-examine a prosecution witness with respect to prior criminal acts is per se reversible error. That would be particularly inappropriate in cases such as this, where the witnesses' prior criminal history was extensively explored on cross-examination although not totally or definitively set forth as the defendant may have wished.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Allen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 898 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NELSON ALLEN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1980

Citations

50 N.Y.2d 898 (N.Y. 1980)
430 N.Y.S.2d 588
408 N.E.2d 917

Citing Cases

People v. Batista

It is, of course, well settled that the permissible scope of cross-examination is a matter subject to the…

People v. Williams

" Where the witness is not a defendant there is no rational basis on which to restrict cross-examination with…