From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Aleschus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
431 N.E.2d 968 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued November 18, 1981

Decided December 17, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, M. ANDREW DWYER, JR., J.

J. Raymond Fisher for appellant.

Charles J. Wilcox, District Attorney ( Robert T. Law, III, of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

With respect to defendant's sole contention on appeal, the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury as to the consequences in the event it found two witnesses to be accomplices, no request to charge was made and no exception to the court's charge was taken. The alleged error therefore was not preserved and is beyond the review of this court.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Aleschus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 17, 1981
431 N.E.2d 968 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Aleschus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT H. ALESCHUS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 1981

Citations

431 N.E.2d 968 (N.Y. 1981)
431 N.E.2d 968
447 N.Y.S.2d 243

Citing Cases

People v. Young

This contention is unpreserved for appellate review. By specifically requesting that the court charge the…

Sluzar v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

In this case, however, no timely objection was made to the inconsistency and the issue has therefore not been…