From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People of Bikini v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 31, 1988
859 F.2d 1482 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

Summary

In People of Bikini v. United States, 859 F.2d 1482 (Fed. Cir. 1988), the Federal Circuit dismissed with prejudice an appeal of claimants in Juda v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 667 (1987), following the enactment of special legislation appropriating funds for the people of Bikini.

Summary of this case from Antolok v. U.S.

Opinion

Appeal Nos. 88-1206 to 87-1208.

October 19, 1988. Unpublished Order Issued October 19, 1988. Published Order Issued October 31, 1988.

Abram Chayes, of Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass., and David R. Anderson, of Wilmer, Cutler Pickering, Washington, D.C., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants. With them on the brief, for the People of Rongelap, Utrik and Other Marshall Islands Atolls were E. Cooper Brown, of Marshall Islands Atomic Testing Litigation Project, Takoma Park, Md., Anne-Marie Burley, of Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass., Richard F. Gerry, of Casey, Gerry, Casey, Westbrook Reed, San Diego, Cal., Fred Baron, of Baron Budd, Dallas, Tex. On the brief, for the People of Enewetak were Lloyd N. Cutler, Andrew B. Weissman, and Richard L.A. Weiner, of Wilmer, Cutler Pickering, Washington, D.C. On the brief, for the People of Bikini was Jonathan M. Weisgall, Washington, D.C.

John T. Stahr, of the Land Natural Resources Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, were Roger J. Marzulla, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jacques B. Gelin, and Gary Randall, attys. Of counsel was Howard L. Hills, of the U.S. Dept. of State, Washington, D.C.

Appealed from United States Claims Court; Kenneth R. Harkins, Judge.

Before SMITH and NIES, Circuit Judges, and SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER


All appellants in Docket No. 88-1206, which is part of the above captioned consolidated appeal, move this court under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 42(b) to dismiss their appeal docketed as No. 88-1206.

That request is based upon P.L. No. 100-466, signed into law by the President on September 27, 1988. That law provides, in part, for the appropriation of $90 million over a five year period for the purpose of funding the Resettlement Trust Fund for the People of Bikini. That fund was established under P.L. No. 97-257. Payment of the funds is conditioned, in part, on the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Appeal No. 88-1206, by the People of Bikini.

Upon consideration of the motion, and because there is no opposition to the motion,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appeal No. 88-1206 is dismissed with prejudice.

(2) Both parties shall bear their own costs.

(3) Any further fees due to this court in connection with Appeal No. 88-1206 shall be paid by appellants in that appeal.


Summaries of

People of Bikini v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 31, 1988
859 F.2d 1482 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

In People of Bikini v. United States, 859 F.2d 1482 (Fed. Cir. 1988), the Federal Circuit dismissed with prejudice an appeal of claimants in Juda v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 667 (1987), following the enactment of special legislation appropriating funds for the people of Bikini.

Summary of this case from Antolok v. U.S.
Case details for

People of Bikini v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF BIKINI, ENEWETAK, RONGELAP, UTRIK AND OTHER MARSHALL ISLANDS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1988

Citations

859 F.2d 1482 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. U.S.

The Federal Circuit consolidated the appeals of the Claims Court in Peter II, Juda II, and Nitol II in People…

People of Enewetak v. U.S.

The claimants in Juda also appealed. That appeal was dismissed with prejudice upon the unopposed motion of…