From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE EX REL. DAUTH MOHR TAXPAYER v. HENNESSEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

January, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.


The relator, a real estate corporation, had a capital of $10,000 and an earned surplus of $349,802.51. From July 10 to September 18, 1931, five corporations were organized and the capital stock was acquired by one corporation. All these corporations had the same stockholders and the same officers. A part of the $349,802.51, earned surplus of the parent corporation, was transferred in different proportions to the corporations thus organized and for it capital stock of the new corporation, of no par value, was transferred to the parent corporation and by it distributed to stockholders. Question whether taxable under subdivision 1 of section 182 Tax of the Tax Law as a dividend. It was so taxed by the State Tax Commission. The surplus thus transferred to these different corporations would not be taxable if distributed by them, because it would have been paid in surplus rather than the earned surplus. Determination unanimously confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

PEOPLE EX REL. DAUTH MOHR TAXPAYER v. HENNESSEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

PEOPLE EX REL. DAUTH MOHR TAXPAYER v. HENNESSEY

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. DAUTH MOHR TAXPAYER HOLDING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Sarner v. Township of Union

People ex rel. Mason v. McClave, 99 N.Y. 83, 89, 90, 1 N.E. 235. It is rejected when it leads to conflict…