From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Barrett v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1994
203 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel could have been raised on a direct appeal from his judgment of conviction, and therefore the relief of habeas corpus does not lie (see, People ex rel. Goss v Smith, 69 N.Y.2d 727).

The petitioner's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Barrett v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1994
203 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Barrett v. Scully

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDDIE BARRETT, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Kuhlmann

See, Billy-Eko v. United States, 8 F.3d 111, 114 (2d Cir. 1993). However, where the claimed instances of…

People v. Connolly

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.…