From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peacock v. Frederick

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1936
170 So. 129 (Fla. 1936)

Opinion

Opinion Filed October 12, 1936.

A case of original jurisdiction — prohibition.

Stewart Stewart and Scarlett Futch, for Petitioner.


Return to the rule nisi in prohibition having been made and it appearing therefrom that petitioner has duly pursued the procedure provided for in Section 4341 C.G.L., 2674 R.G.S., for the disqualification of respondent to act as Judge in the cause described in the rule nisi heretofore issued, it is thereupon ordered, on authority of Dickenson v. Parks, 104 Fla. 577, 140 Sou. Rep. 459, text page 462, that the writ of prohibition absolute prohibiting the respondent H.B. Frederick, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit in and for Volusia County, from further acting or making any order or decree other than an order of disqualification in the cause referred to and described in the rule nisi heretofore issued in this proceeding, be granted.

Prohibition awarded.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Peacock v. Frederick

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1936
170 So. 129 (Fla. 1936)
Case details for

Peacock v. Frederick

Case Details

Full title:J.E. PEACOCK v. HERBERT B. FREDERICK, as Judge of the Seventh Judicial…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 12, 1936

Citations

170 So. 129 (Fla. 1936)
170 So. 129

Citing Cases

Scussel v. Kelly

"In the Berger Case, the Supreme Court of the United States considered and construed a statute very similar…