From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 20, 1978
362 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 78-1230.

September 8, 1978. As Modified September 20, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Vincent T. Hall, J.


Appellant moved to vacate the sentence given him after a plea of guilty, alleging that his appointed counsel was ineffective and that his plea was involuntary. The trial judge denied the motion without attaching any portion of the record or file and without holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the veracity of appellant's allegations.

If, as is the case here, a motion to vacate sentence addresses matters which can be raised in a collateral attack, and alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a prisoner to relief, then the judge reviewing the motion must attach that portion of the case file or record which conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or grant an evidentiary hearing. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. Neither action was taken by the court below. The cause is, therefore, REMANDED to the trial court under a temporary relinquishment of jurisdiction with instructions (a) to attach that portion of the case file and record which refutes appellant's allegations; or (b) to conduct an evidentiary hearing and, then, either grant or deny the relief sought by appellant.

GRIMES, C.J., and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 20, 1978
362 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Payne v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY L. PAYNE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 20, 1978

Citations

362 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Van Bever v. State

Because no portion of the record was attached to its order of denial, the trial court impliedly found the…

Stephens v. State

Neither action was taken by the court below. Therefore, the order denying appellant's motion under Florida…