From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrish v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-391.

May 21, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, Gayle S. Graziano, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Barry Parrish, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence in an aggravated battery case. Appellant was on probation for the aggravated battery and violated terms of his probation. When he came to court for sentencing the judge used a new, revised, updated sentencing guideline scoresheet to find the proper allowable sentence. This was error. The original scoresheet should have been used; the one prepared and used at his original sentencing hearing when he got probation. Holloman v. State, 600 So.2d 522 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED for RESENTENCING.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Parrish v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 21, 1993
617 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Parrish v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY PARRISH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 21, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

In addition, the trial court erred at the sentencing for Wilson's violation of probation by using a newly…

Smith v. State

The State concedes that the use of a new scoresheet to sentence Smith on the three cases enumerated above was…