From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 2, 2014
137 So. 3d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

noting that sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding that requires a renewed offer of counsel

Summary of this case from Pugh v. State

Opinion

No. 2D12–3697.

2014-05-2

Thomas PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal A. Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.



Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal A. Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
SLEET, Judge.

Thomas Parker appeals his judgment and sentence for aggravated stalking. He raises two issues on appeal, the first of which we affirm without further comment. As for the second issue, Parker argues that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to conduct a Faretta inquiry before sentencing him. Because the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel before sentencing Parker, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).

Nearly a month before trial, Parker opted to waive his right to counsel and elected to represent himself. At that time, the trial court conducted a Faretta inquiry and allowed Parker to represent himself throughout the trial. However, when the jury returned with the guilty verdict, the trial court proceeded immediately to sentencing without renewing the offer of counsel. In doing so, the trial court erred. “Once a defendant waives the right to counsel in a criminal case, the court must renew the offer of counsel at each subsequent critical stage of the proceedings, one of which is sentencing.” Serrano v. State, 113 So.3d 895, 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); see also Ingraham v. State, 32 So.3d 761, 768–69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that sentencing is a critical stage of criminal proceedings and the offer of counsel must be renewed at each critical stage where the defendant appears without counsel). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing.

ALTENBERND and KHOUZAM, JJ. Concur.




Summaries of

Parker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 2, 2014
137 So. 3d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

noting that sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding that requires a renewed offer of counsel

Summary of this case from Pugh v. State
Case details for

Parker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: May 2, 2014

Citations

137 So. 3d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Pugh v. State

Once charged, a criminal defendant is entitled to decide at each “crucial stage” of the proceedings whether…

Murray v. State

Even where no intervening event occurs, the court must renew the offer of counsel prior to each critical…