Summary
In Pancoast v. Crews, 119 So.3d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), petitioner was warned that any further unauthorized petitions filed in this court challenging his Pinellas County convictions may result in the imposition of sanctions against him. Although petitioner has attempted to circumvent the warning in that opinion by having a “friend” file this petition on his behalf, petitioner cannot avoid the imposition of sanctions by the filing of a petition by a third party.
Summary of this case from Pancoast v. CrewsOpinion
No. 1D13–1778.
2013-05-17
Philip PANCOAST, Petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction. Philip Pancoast, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
Philip Pancoast, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Petitioner is cautioned that the filing of any further unauthorized petitions with this court challenging his Pinellas County convictions and sentences may result in the imposition of sanctions against him.