From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palermo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 14, 1958
254 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 15809.

April 14, 1958.

Velikanje, Velikanje Moore, John S. Moore, Jr., E.F. Velikanje, Yakima, Wash., for appellant.

William M. Bantz, U.S. Atty., Riner E. Deglow, Spokane, Wash., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, Chief Judge, and DENMAN and BARNES, Circuit Judges.


Palermo appeals from a judgment of the District Court of the Eastern District of Washington on a jury verdict holding him guilty of willfully attempting to evade a large portion of the income taxes of himself and his wife for the calendar years 1950 to 1953 inclusive, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 145(b) (1939 code).

We find no merit in appellant's contentions (a) that the obvious and manifold omissions of income in his written statements to the maker of his returns and thereafter the filing of the returns by him did not constitute sufficient evidence to show his criminal intent; (b) that certain refused requested instructions were not sufficiently covered by the instructions given; or (c) that the evidence of similar conduct leading to understatements of income in other tax years was improperly admitted.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Palermo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 14, 1958
254 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Palermo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Joe PALERMO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 14, 1958

Citations

254 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1958)

Citing Cases

McCarty v. United States

We conclude that the question of willfulness was for the jury. Swallow v. United States, 307 F.2d 81 (10th…

State v. Riconosciuto

Evidence of prior failure to report, of consistent understatement of tax liability, or prior understatements…