Summary
holding that forty class members satisfied the numerosity requirement
Summary of this case from Rebibo v. Axton Owners, Inc.Opinion
February 21, 2008.
Actions — Class Actions.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
PAJACZEK v. CEMA CONSTR. CORP
Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Feb 21, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Summaries of
PAJACZEK v. CEMA CONSTR. CORP
Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Feb 21, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
holding that forty class members satisfied the numerosity requirement
Summary of this case from Rebibo v. Axton Owners, Inc.Case details for
PAJACZEK v. CEMA CONSTR. CORP
Case Details
Full title:Pajaczek v. CEMA Constr. Corp
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Date published: Feb 21, 2008
Citations
18 Misc. 3d 1140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50386
859 N.Y.S.2d 897
Citing Cases
Rebibo v. Axton Owners, Inc.
This is sufficient to satisfy the numerosity requirement.See Pajaczek v. CEMA Constr. Corp., 18 Misc. 3d…
Ramos v. SimplexGrinnell LPSimilarly, New York state courts have repeatedly approved class certification of prevailing wage claims…