From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pagan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 1, 1994
637 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-02752.

June 1, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Manuel Menendez, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for manslaughter. We affirm the conviction, but reverse for correction of the written order of probation.

Special probation condition # 4, which implies that the defendant may possess a firearm with his probation officer's permission, must be stricken because, as a convicted felon, the defendant may not lawfully possess a firearm. Mercer v. State, 604 So.2d 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Special probation condition # 6, relating to the defendant's use of intoxicants, must also be stricken because the trial court did not orally pronounce it in open court. Carter v. State, 606 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded with directions to strike conditions # 4 and # 6 from the probation order.

HALL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.


Summaries of

Pagan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 1, 1994
637 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Pagan v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN K. PAGAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 1, 1994

Citations

637 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Stark v. State

We agree that the portion of probation condition (4), which implies that the defendant may possess a firearm…

Snyder v. State

On the other hand, the analysis in Wheeler v. State, 465 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), allows a sentenced…