From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PACIFIC LBR. SHIPPING CO. v. STAR SHIPPING A/S

United States District Court, W.D. Washington
Feb 23, 1979
464 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Wash. 1979)

Opinion

No. C79-140.

February 23, 1979.

David Danielson, of Lane, Powell, Moss Miller, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Thomas J. McKey, of Bogle Gates, Seattle, Wash., for defendants and claimant.


ORDER


The motions of defendant Star Shipping A/S and the claimant of the M.S. STAR CLIPPER to shorten time for hearing of motion to quash notice of deposition, to shorten time for hearing of motion for stay of action pending arbitration, to quash notice of depositions and for protective order, and for stay of action pending arbitration, were heard by the Court on February 13 and 15, 1979. The Court has considered the arguments of counsel and the briefs and affidavits submitted, including but not limited to, defendants' briefs and affidavits of Thomas McKey and Carol Nett dated February 14, 1979 and plaintiffs' brief and affidavits of David Danielson (including its exhibits) dated February 15, 1979 and the affidavit of Gerald Strand dated February 14, 1979. At issue is the effect of the following clause which is on the face of all of the applicable bills of lading:

ALL DISPUTES ARISING UNDER THIS BILL OF LADING SHALL BE SETTLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARBITRATION ACT OF 1950 IN LONDON. THE AWARD OF THE ARBITRATORS OR UMPIRE TO BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON BOTH PARTIES.

The affidavit of Carol Nett establishes that the so-called "London arbitration clause" was inserted in defendant Star Shipping A/S's Mediterranean bills of lading at Star's direction. The affidavits of Nett, Gerald Strand and David Danielson indicate that the "London arbitration clause" was not negotiated or discussed with the shippers of cargo transported on vessels owned or chartered by Star. From the materials presented to the Court, there is no indication that the shippers ever had an option to have that clause deleted. Further, the affidavits of Strand and Danielson illustrate that the bills of lading which were identified in those affidavits were not received by the shippers in their completed form until after the STAR CLIPPER sailed from Coos Bay.

These bills of lading are contracts of adhesion, and I find that the "London arbitration clause" was not freely negotiated between the parties. That clause is a foreign forum clause. This case is governed by the provisions of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) 46 U.S. Code, § 1300, et seq. and violates § 1303(8) of COGSA. Mitsui Co., Ltd., et al. v. M/V GLORY RIVER, et al., 464 F. Supp. 1004, No. C78-259B, (W.D.Wn. 1978); Indussa Corporation v. S.S. Ranborg, 377 F.2d 200 (2d Cir. 1967); Northern Assurance Co., Ltd. v. M/V CASPIAN CAREER, 1977 A.M.C. 421 (N.D.Cal. 1977). If ocean carriers were allowed to unilaterally select the forum for the resolution of cargo claims it would be an invitation to carriers to select forums having no relationship to the ports of loading or discharge and the carriers would be at liberty to select forums that might not fairly enforce COGSA.

Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

1. The motions of Star Shipping A/S and the claimant to shorten time for hearing of motion to quash notice of deposition and to shorten time for hearing of motion to stay of action pending arbitration are granted.

2. The motions of Star Shipping A/S and the claimant for stay of action pending arbitration and to quash notice of depositions and for protective order are denied.


Summaries of

PACIFIC LBR. SHIPPING CO. v. STAR SHIPPING A/S

United States District Court, W.D. Washington
Feb 23, 1979
464 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Wash. 1979)
Case details for

PACIFIC LBR. SHIPPING CO. v. STAR SHIPPING A/S

Case Details

Full title:PACIFIC LUMBER SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., Heidner International Corp., R.W…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington

Date published: Feb 23, 1979

Citations

464 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Wash. 1979)

Citing Cases

Japan Sun Oil Co. v. The M/V Maasdijk

M/V Luo Fu Shan and M/V Finnrose also both relied on Indussa Corp. v. S.S. Ranborg, 377 F.2d 200 (2d Cir.…

Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S.A. v. M/V Sky Reefer

We recognize, however, that maritime bills of lading have been viewed as contracts of adhesion. See. e.g.,…