From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ownby v. Citrus County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 5, 2009
13 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Summary

reversing order denying intervention where intervention appeared to be appropriate, trial court gave no reason for denying intervention, and no valid reason was apparent on the existing record

Summary of this case from Larraín Troncoso v. Ossandón Larrain

Opinion

Nos. 5D07-4102, 5D08-44.

June 5, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Citrus County, Patricia V. Thomas, J.

Jill H. Bowman and J. Andrew Meyer of James, Hoyer, Newcomer and Smiljanich, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Charles Wachter and Hala A. Sandridge of Fowler White Boggs Banker P.A., Tampa, and Robert Battista, Inverness, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.


In this consolidated appeal, Appellant James Ownby challenges the trial court's denial of class certification. Appellants Fernando and Edith Monroy challenge the denial of a subsequent motion for the Monroys to intervene and be substituted as class representatives. The cross appeal was abandoned. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(2)(vi).

Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the trial court's determination that class certification should be denied because the proposed class representative failed to establish that he would adequately represent the putative class. However, we do conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to intervene. Intervention is ordinarily liberally allowed absent some valid reason for denial. Department of Children and Family Services v. Brunner, 707 So.2d 1197, 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Here, the trial court gave no reason for denying the intervention and none is apparent to us. The case met all the criteria for class certification except the adequacy of the proffered representative. The intervening parties were members of the very large, putative class. Although the litigation had been pending for some time, the case had not been set for trial, and there is no indication that the intervention would delay the proceeding.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

TORPY and LAWSON, J.J., and COBB, W., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Ownby v. Citrus County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 5, 2009
13 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

reversing order denying intervention where intervention appeared to be appropriate, trial court gave no reason for denying intervention, and no valid reason was apparent on the existing record

Summary of this case from Larraín Troncoso v. Ossandón Larrain

reversing order denying intervention where intervention appeared to be appropriate, trial court gave no reason for denying intervention, and no valid reason was apparent on the existing record

Summary of this case from María Soledad Larraín Troncoso v. Manuel Antonio Ossandón Larraín
Case details for

Ownby v. Citrus County

Case Details

Full title:James D. OWNBY, etc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CITRUS COUNTY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 5, 2009

Citations

13 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

María Soledad Larraín Troncoso v. Manuel Antonio Ossandón Larraín

We conclude that the failure to conduct a hearing, combined with the failure to articulate any findings in…

Larraín Troncoso v. Ossandón Larrain

We conclude that the failure to conduct a hearing, combined with the failure to articulate any findings in…