From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 20, 2022
346 So. 3d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D22-0003

04-20-2022

Brandon OWENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Brandon Owens, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Brandon Owens, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Brandon Owens, appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion alleged seven grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error in the denial of claims one, two, three, four, five, and seven. We conclude, however, that because claim six, alleging that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to appellant's absence at the sentencing hearing, is not conclusively refuted by the record, it merits remand. Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing or, in the alternative, append record evidence conclusively establishing appellant's absence was either voluntary or did not result in prejudice. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(2) ; Capuzzo v. State, 596 So. 2d 438, 440 (Fla. 1992) ; Reynolds v. State, 313 So. 3d 129, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) ; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Summaries of

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 20, 2022
346 So. 3d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Owens v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon OWENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

346 So. 3d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)