From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 11, 2009
1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Summary

remanding for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order that reflected the correct cost amounts

Summary of this case from Hayes v. State

Opinion

No. 2D07-5565.

February 11, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel H. Sleet, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Raymond Owens challenges his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm without comment. However, it appears that, after granting Owens' Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion to correct illegal sentence, the post-conviction court failed to enter an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation. Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation that reflect the correct cost amounts. See Jackson v. State, 950 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 11, 2009
1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

remanding for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order that reflected the correct cost amounts

Summary of this case from Hayes v. State
Case details for

Owens v. State

Case Details

Full title:Raymond OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. State

We remand for the limited purpose of the trial court correcting Jackson's sentence and order of probation in…

Headrick v. State

Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order. See Owens v. State, 1…