From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. McTeer

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District
Jul 24, 1973
299 N.E.2d 764 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)

Opinion

No. 70-50 Judgment affirmed.

July 24, 1973.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Madison County; the Hon. WILLIAM JOHNSON, Judge, presiding.

Goldenhersh and Goldenhersh, of East St. Louis, (Michael A. Katz, of counsel,) for appellant.

Oehmke, Dunham, Boman Leskera, of East St. Louis, (Robert D. Francis, of counsel,) for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Madison County, wherein a complaint filed by plaintiff, Mildred Owens, the owner and operator of a liquor store, sought as a result of a suit filed under the Dram Shop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. (1967), ch. 43, par. 135), to recover indemnity against defendant, Harold McTeer, was dismissed.

The only issue is whether one who is sued under the Illinois Dram Shop Act may bring an action for indemnity against an alleged intoxicated person for the acts of the alleged intoxicated person which result in a suit against the alleged tavern or liquor store owner.

The issue has been resolved by our Supreme Court in Wessel v. Carmi Elks Home, Inc., 54 Ill.2d 127, 295 N.E.2d 718, in which it was held that as a matter of law those who may incur liability under section 14 of article IV of the Liquor Control Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. (1971), ch. 43, par. 135) may not seek indemnity from one, who being in an intoxicated condition, committed a tortious act which gives rise to the dram shop action.

We therefore affirm.

G. MORAN and JONES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Owens v. McTeer

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District
Jul 24, 1973
299 N.E.2d 764 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)
Case details for

Owens v. McTeer

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD McTEER, Defendant-Appellee

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 24, 1973

Citations

299 N.E.2d 764 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)
299 N.E.2d 764

Citing Cases

Doyle v. Rhodes

Inasmuch as the Contribution Act codified Skinner rather than changing it, we conclude that the Act requires…