From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onstad v. Wilkinson

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
534 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-2760

2013-10-22

Alan Cole Onstad Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mary Ann Wilkinson, Clerk, Circuit Court, Lee County, Arkansas; Richard L. Proctor, Circuit Judge, Lee County, Arkansas; Lee County Arkansas Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena


[Unpublished]

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Alan Onstad appeals the district court's preservice dismissal, with prejudice, of his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, essentially asserting that he was wrongfully denied in forma pauperis (IFP) status in state court, which prevented him from bringing a conditions-of-confinement case in state court. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (in civil action in which prisoner seeks redress from governmental entity or officer or employee of governmental entity, court shall review complaint as soon as practicable and dismiss it if it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state claim, or seeks monetary relief from defendant who is immune); see also Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review of § 1915A dismissal). Specifically, we agree with the district court that Onstad's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See Williams v. McKenzie, 834 F.2d 152, 153-54 (8th Cir. 1987) (stating general rule that IFP litigant's access to court is matter of privilege, not of right); cf. Murray v. Dosal, 150 F.3d 814, 817 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (noting that Supreme Court has never recognized unlimited rule that indigent plaintiffs at all times and in all cases have right to relief without payment of fees).

The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Onstad's motion for appointment of counsel.


Summaries of

Onstad v. Wilkinson

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
534 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Onstad v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:Alan Cole Onstad Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mary Ann Wilkinson, Clerk…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

534 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Taalak v. Pavalis

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this Court must screen prisoner claims filed in forma pauperis and determine whether…

Scott v. Carpenter

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this Court must screen prisoner claims filed in forma pauperis and determine whether…