Opinion
Civil Case No. 08-459-AC.
April 24, 2009
Robert E. Babcock, Babcock/Haynes LLP, Lake Oswego, Oregon, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Agnes Sowle, County Attorney, Multnomah County Oregon, Jenny M. Morf, Bernadette Nunley, Assistant County Attorneys, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.
ORDER
The Honorable John Acosta, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on March 25, 2009. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.
When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Acosta.
This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Acosta dated March 25, 2009 in its entirety.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike (#20) is denied. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#12) is granted.