From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.Y.C. Transit Auth. v. Trans. Workers Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 14, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.),


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not err in vacating that portion of the arbitration award which modified the penalty imposed by the petitioner upon an employee from dismissal to a time-served suspension. The employee's misconduct, which occurred while he was operating a subway train, clearly jeopardized the safety of the passengers. Directing the employee's reinstatement under such circumstances is contrary to public policy and to the petitioner's important statutory responsibility to operate the transit system for the safety of the public ( see, Public Authorities Law § 1204; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union, 220 A.D.2d 749; see also, Matter of State Univ. v. Young, 170 A.D.2d 510; Matter of Ford v. Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., 94 A.D.2d 262).

O'Brien, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

N.Y.C. Transit Auth. v. Trans. Workers Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

N.Y.C. Transit Auth. v. Trans. Workers Union

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent, v. TRANSPORT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 114

Citing Cases

Shannon v. New York City Transit Authority

NYCTA has a statutory obligation pursuant to New York State Public Authorities Law § 1204(15) to operate the…

Shannon v. New York City Transit Authority

No reasonable jury could find that NYCTA exceeded the broad bounds necessarily afforded it under the ADA to…