From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Petrovsky

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 8, 2006
933 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-339.

June 8, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 1D05-5118.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norton v. Petrovsky

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 8, 2006
933 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Norton v. Petrovsky

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE J. NORTON, Petitioner v. JOSEPH S. PETROVSKY, ET AL., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 8, 2006

Citations

933 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2006)