From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Judson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 17, 1983
439 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-1685.

October 12, 1983. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1983.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Miette K. Burnstein, J.

Jerome R. Silberberg, of Gibbs Zei, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Richard J. Roselli of Krupnick Campbell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.


Petitioner/hospital contends that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in requiring it to produce an "incident report." These reports are specifically dealt with in Section 768.41(4), Florida Statutes (1981). We deny certiorari. Having never been apprised by the hospital that "incident reports" are recognized statutorily as attorney work product, the trial court was deprived of the opportunity to rule on the application of the statute to these reports. Furthermore, because the trial court was not aware that the documents the hospital sought to protect were statutorily designated work product, the issue of undue hardship was never ruled upon.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

LETTS, BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Judson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 17, 1983
439 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Judson

Case Details

Full title:NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, DOING BUSINESS AS IMPERIAL POINT MEDICAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 17, 1983

Citations

439 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. P.C

It does not appear that the state ever presented to the trial court the issue it asks us to resolve by its…

South Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Gaudia

We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the discovery order of the trial court without prejudice to…