From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 5, 1998
525 U.S. 876 (1998)

Summary

holding that "when parties include such a broad arbitration clause, they intend the clause to reach all aspects of the relationship."

Summary of this case from First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. Fairley

Opinion

No. 98-178.

October 5, 1998, OCTOBER TERM, 1998.


C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 141 F. 3d 1059.


Summaries of

Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 5, 1998
525 U.S. 876 (1998)

holding that "when parties include such a broad arbitration clause, they intend the clause to reach all aspects of the relationship."

Summary of this case from First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. Fairley

stating that, “[w]here no mathematical error appears on the face of the award,” “an arbitration award will not be altered”

Summary of this case from In re Bank
Case details for

Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NOBELPHARMA AB ET AL. v. IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

525 U.S. 876 (1998)

Citing Cases

In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative "ERISA"

Kuper v. lovenko, 66 F.3d 1447, 1459-60 (6th Cir. 1995) (To satisfy the causation link between a breach of…

Voyager Life Ins. Co. v. Caldwell

Procedural unconscionability occurs when Plaintiff proves "lack of knowledge, lack of voluntariness,…