From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 22, 2016
188 So. 3d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–955.

04-22-2016

Dede NICHOLS, Appellant, v. MOORE, STEPHENS, LOVELACE, P.A., Appellee.

Denise M. Hammond and Curtis L. Brown, of Wright, Fulford, Morehead & Brown, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Todd K. Norman and Bernard H. Gentry, of Broad and Cassel, Orlando, for Appellee.


Denise M. Hammond and Curtis L. Brown, of Wright, Fulford, Morehead & Brown, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Todd K. Norman and Bernard H. Gentry, of Broad and Cassel, Orlando, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Carter, 9 So.3d 1258, 1263–64 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding noncompetition clause in an employment agreement to be valid and enforceable; the language of the clause was clear and unambiguous, reasonably limited in time, reasonably limited in not precluding all competition, and the lack of a geographical limitation was not critical).

SAWAYA, COHEN, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 22, 2016
188 So. 3d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A.

Case Details

Full title:DEDE NICHOLS, Appellant, v. MOORE, STEPHENS, LOVELACE, P.A., Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 22, 2016

Citations

188 So. 3d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Yardley v. Caruthersville Motor Co.

(1) Judgment against a corporation is conclusive against the stockholder. Scott v. Barton, 285 Mo. 427, l.c.…