From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Seven-Up Bottling Company v. Dow Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided February 16, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN C. MARBACH, J.

Frank H. Connelly, Jr., for appellant.

Bruce D. Drucker for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 96 A.D.2d 1051). We note, however, that this case, unlike Lindsey v Robins Co. ( 60 N.Y.2d 417, 429), does not involve a fact question concerning when the defect first caused injury. Here the roof was leaking "like a sieve" in 1972, so injury to plaintiff from the defect clearly occurred more than three years before suit was brought.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

New York Seven-Up Bottling Company v. Dow Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

New York Seven-Up Bottling Company v. Dow Chemical Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. DOW CHEMICAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1984)
473 N.Y.S.2d 973
462 N.E.2d 150

Citing Cases

Trisvan v. Heyman

The only meaningful difference between the fraud and other claims is the element of scienter —knowledge of…

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Indus., Inc.

While plaintiffs assert that the continued presence of roadway defects caused by defendants' faulty…