From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nevanranta v. Koski

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 29, 1956
138 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. 1956)

Opinion

November 29, 1956.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Sumner W. Elton, for the defendant.

Thomas S. Carey, for the plaintiff.


Exceptions overruled. The defendant excepted to the denial of her motion for a directed verdict and to the admission of certain medical evidence. The action was to recover for personal injuries incurred on January 28, 1951, in Foxboro caused by the alleged gross negligence of the defendant in operating an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest. There was evidence of persistence in a negligent course of conduct over an appreciable period of time culminating in an accident sufficient under our decisions to warrant a finding for the plaintiff. See Dombrowski v. Gedman, 299 Mass. 87; O'Neill v. McDonald, 301 Mass. 256, 259; McGaffigan v. Kennedy, 302 Mass. 12, 14-15. There was no error in finding the attending physician of the plaintiff, who was a general practitioner, qualified to give an opinion that the accident was a contributing cause of the plaintiff's tuberculosis which subsequently developed and in allowing his testimony to this effect to stand. See Hardiman v. Brown, 162 Mass. 585, 587.


Summaries of

Nevanranta v. Koski

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 29, 1956
138 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. 1956)
Case details for

Nevanranta v. Koski

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER NEVANRANTA vs. JENNY KOSKI

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 29, 1956

Citations

138 N.E.2d 376 (Mass. 1956)
335 Mass. 760

Citing Cases

Nadler v. Baybank Merrimack Valley, N.A.

Thus, it has been held that a judge, in his discretion, properly admitted the opinions of a general…

Kapp v. Ballantine

Thus, it has been held that a judge, in his discretion, properly admitted the opinions of a general…