From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 19, 1991
581 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

In N.C. v. State, 581 So.2d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), the Fourth District followed a different procedure and reversed an adjudication of delinquency for grand theft auto and discharged the juvenile defendant based on Gould.

Summary of this case from I.T. v. State

Opinion

No. 90-2050.

June 19, 1991. Rehearing Denied July 19, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, John A. Miller, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


ON REHEARING


Sua sponte we grant rehearing and substitute the following for our previous opinions:

We reverse appellant's adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile. Appellant's "mere presence as an after-acquired passenger in a vehicle, with knowledge that it has been stolen, [was] insufficient to convict [him] of [automobile] theft." State v. G.C., 572 So.2d 1380, 1382 (Fla. 1991).

Although section 924.34 of the Florida Statutes (1989) gives an appellate court the authority to direct a trial court to enter judgment for a lesser offense, the supreme court recently held in Gould v. State, 577 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 1991), that the section only applies to category one lesser included offenses. It rejected the argument that the section also includes category two lesser included offenses. Id. at 1304. The Schedule of Lesser Included Offenses does not list a category one lesser offense for the charged offense of grand theft — third degree. Fla.Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 3/89, p. 293. Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to discharge appellant.

Offenses necessarily included in the offense charged, which will include some lesser degrees of offenses. Comment on Schedule of Lesser Included Offenses, Fla.Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 3/89, p. 283.

Offenses which may or may not be included in the offense charged, depending on the accusatory pleading and the evidence, which will include all attempts and some lesser degrees of offenses. Comment on Schedule of Lesser Included Offenses, Fla.Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 3/89, p. 283.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

N.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 19, 1991
581 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

In N.C. v. State, 581 So.2d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), the Fourth District followed a different procedure and reversed an adjudication of delinquency for grand theft auto and discharged the juvenile defendant based on Gould.

Summary of this case from I.T. v. State
Case details for

N.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF N.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 19, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

I.T. v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision in I.T. v. State, 657 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), which the…

State v. Sigler

In directing adjudication for trespass in a conveyance, the district court relied on State v. G.C., 572 So.2d…