Summary
denying the defendants' request for taxable costs because defendants failed to comply with the requirements of the court's local rule
Summary of this case from Gary v. Carbon Cycle Ariz. LLCOpinion
CIVIL NO. 11-00786 JMS-KSC
04-01-2014
HERBERT J. NAMOHALA, Plaintiff, v. SATORU STEWART MAEDA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on March 12, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANTS SATORU STEWART MAEDA AND MITSUYO MAEDA'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS," Doc. No. 168, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 1, 2014.
__________
J. Michael Seabright
United States District Judge
Namohala v. Maeda, et al., Civ. No. 11-00786 JMS-KSC, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation