From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 14, 1998
704 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

holding that special condition of probation prohibiting use and possession of alcohol and frequenting places where alcohol is the main source of business must be orally pronounced at sentencing

Summary of this case from Story v. State

Opinion

Case No. 96-03587

Opinion filed January 14, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Dennis P. Maloney, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant, Robert Murphy, challenges the trial court's judgments and sentences imposed upon him after a jury found him guilty of possession of cocaine, possession of methamphetamine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving while license is suspended or revoked. We affirm the judgments and sentences imposed upon the appellant. We agree, however, with appellant's contention that the trial court erred in imposing portions of probation condition (18).

Probation condition (18) states: "You shall not (consume any alcohol/illegal drugs) (be in possession of alcohol or illegal drugs) (associate with persons who use alcohol or illegal drugs) (frequent places where alcohol is the main source of business or illegal drugs are used)." Those portions of condition (18) which provide that appellant shall not consume alcohol, possess alcohol, associate with persons who use alcohol, or frequent places where alcohol is the main source of business, are special conditions of probation which must be orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing. See Callaway v. State, 658 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Since they were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing they must be stricken.

We, accordingly, strike those portions of condition (18) which were improperly imposed upon appellant. We affirm the judgments and sentences in all other respects. Affirmed as modified.

BLUE, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., and FICARROTTA, GASPER J., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.


Summaries of

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 14, 1998
704 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

holding that special condition of probation prohibiting use and possession of alcohol and frequenting places where alcohol is the main source of business must be orally pronounced at sentencing

Summary of this case from Story v. State
Case details for

Murphy v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 14, 1998

Citations

704 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Story v. State

Condition 15, which prohibits Story from consuming alcoholic beverages or visiting businesses where the main…

England v. State

Similarly, the condition prohibiting England from frequenting bars is a special condition that should have…