From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Hannah Home Shelter

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Oct 27, 2005
Civil Action No.: 2:05-2621-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 2:05-2621-CWH.

October 27, 2005


ORDER


On September 12, 2005, the plaintiff, a resident of South Carolina, filed a complaint pro se against Hannah Home Shelter; Sharon Roach, director of Hannah Home; and Indian Rivers Mental Health Center. On September 29, 2005, Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko filed a report and recommended that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Attached to the report and recommendation was a "Notice of Right to File Objections." Pursuant to that Notice, the plaintiff herein was provided ten days during which to file written objections to the report and recommendation and informed of the consequences resulting from a failure to do so. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The plaintiff has not filed any objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kosko's report and recommendation and dismisses this action without prejudice and without service of process for lack of jurisdiction.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Hannah Home Shelter

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Oct 27, 2005
Civil Action No.: 2:05-2621-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)
Case details for

Murphy v. Hannah Home Shelter

Case Details

Full title:Rosanne Edwards Murphy, Plaintiff, v. Hannah Home Shelter; Sharon Roach…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No.: 2:05-2621-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)

Citing Cases

Applegate v. Lexington, c., Mining Co.

I. A copy of a deed is admissible as evidence only when acknowledgment or proof thereof is legally sufficient…