From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 20, 1995
666 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-04557.

December 20, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William J. Nelson, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Julia Diaz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Counsel for Kevin Murph filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement.

At the sentencing hearing the court stated that it sentenced Murph to three and one-half years in prison for robbery with a firearm in Case No. 92-3041CF. The trial court entered a written sentence of seventy-one months in prison on that charge. This court must remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We, therefore, remand with directions to the trial court to enter a written sentence which complies with its oral pronouncement.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 20, 1995
666 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Murph v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN MURPH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 20, 1995

Citations

666 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

L.G. v. State

We agree with L.G. that the written order must conform to a clear and unambiguous oral pronouncement or…

B.R.W. v. State

Based on the evidence and the trial court's oral pronouncement, we agree that the disposition order must be…