From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munnerlyn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 5, 2001
795 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case Nos. 4D00-2376 4D00-3136

Opinion filed September 5, 2001

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marc H. Gold, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 98-18686 CF 10 A 98-20134 CF 10 A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order revoking appellant's probation. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing because the record suggests that the trial court mistakenly believed it had no discretion but to sentence appellant to prison for the balance of the suspended portion of his original sentence once he violated his probation. See Bryant v. State, 591 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). On remand, the trial court shall exercise its sentencing discretion and consider all sentencing alternatives.

Additionally, we remand for correction of the written sentence of fifteen years imprisonment on Count II of Case Number 98-20134CR (possession of cocaine) to conform to the oral pronouncement of five years imprisonment, which is the statutory maximum for that count.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

STONE, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Munnerlyn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 5, 2001
795 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Munnerlyn v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE MUNNERLYN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 5, 2001

Citations

795 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Goldwire v. State

Therefore, the trial court is not required to impose the minimum mandatory sentence, but instead, is able to…

Eustache v. State

As explained above, the trial judge imposed Eustache's current sentence after being incorrectly told by both…