From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulligan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 26, 1997
688 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-02628

Opinion filed February 26, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; William R. Webb, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Gerard Mulligan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal. She points out, however, that the trial court failed to enter written reasons under section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1994), for imposing adult sanctions on Mulligan. Upon a review of the record, we agree that no grounds for reversal exist. Accordingly, we affirm Mulligan's judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court for the entry of written reasons. Mulligan need not be present.

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Mulligan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 26, 1997
688 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Mulligan v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERARD THOMAS MULLIGAN, APPELLANT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 26, 1997

Citations

688 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the sentence imposing adult sanctions for armed robbery and carrying a concealed weapon…

State v. Hansen

Having determined that the trial court erred by withholding adjudication of guilt as a permissible downward…