From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morreale v. Serrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2009
67 A.D.3d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-11365.

November 4, 2009.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated November 19, 2008, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

Barnes Barnes, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Matthew J. Barnes of counsel), for appellant.

Lisa Serrano, Effort, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint, inasmuch as the plaintiff failed to meet his initial burden of establishing, by admissible evidence, his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). To the extent that the plaintiff relied on the defendant's response to his notice to admit, that notice improperly sought the defendant's admissions to facts that went to "the heart of the matter" ( Lolly v Brookdale Univ. Hosp. Med. Ctr., 45 AD3d 537; see Glasser v City of New York, 265 AD2d 526). In light of our determination, we need not examine the sufficiency of the papers submitted by the defendant in opposition to the motion ( see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Morreale v. Serrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2009
67 A.D.3d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Morreale v. Serrano

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MORREALE, Appellant, v. LISA SERRANO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7992
886 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Pride Acquisitions LLC v. Benson

It is not intended to cover ultimate conclusions, which can only be made after a full and complete trial"…

Poluboczek v. P.C. Richard & Son, LLC

Here, plaintiff could not have reasonably believe that the admissions which he seeks on the issues of, inter…