From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1978
365 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 78-438.

November 1, 1978. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Philip A. Federico, J.

Jack Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Harry Ned Morgan, Jr. appeals his sentences for two counts of burglary and one count of escape. Only one of the issues raised merits discussion here: whether there is a discrepancy between the trial court's announced intention and the sentence actually imposed. We find there is such a discrepancy and remand for reconsideration and any concomitant correction of the sentence found necessary.

The trial judge announced at the conclusion of the sentencing hearing that he intended appellant serve a total of twenty years in prison. In the thereafter filed written judgment and sentence appellant was given two consecutive fifteen year sentences and one five year sentence concurrent with one of the fifteen year sentences — a total of thirty years, not twenty. The record fails to disclose any change of mind or other explanation for this discrepancy. The trial court should clarify its intent and, if necessary, correct the sentence accordingly.

Appellant received fifteen years on each of two burglary counts. Since he was charged in both counts with burglary of a dwelling, these offenses were second degree felonies, Section 810.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1977), punishable by up to fifteen years in prison. Section 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1977). Appellant's five year sentence on the escape charge, which is also a second degree felony, Section 944.40, Fla. Stat. (1977), is also within the statutory maximum set by Section 775.082.

We find no merit in the other points raised by appellant.

The convictions are affirmed but the cause is remanded for the purpose herein stated. The defendant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Morgan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1978
365 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Morgan v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARRY N. MORGAN, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 11, 1978

Citations

365 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

G.E.G. v. State

In re J.P., 405 So.2d 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (not denial of equal protection for juvenile probation to…