From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moorer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 8, 1990
556 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1952.

February 8, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Joseph Q. Tarbuck, J.

Ashley Brett Moorer, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellant filed a motion under Rule 3.800(a) or 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, seeking credit for 303 days spent in jail. The trial court denied the order on the stated ground that this issue should have been raised during appellant's direct appeal.

A sentence which does not allow for proper credit is an illegal sentence. Baranko v. State, 516 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Under Rule 3.800, an illegal sentence may be corrected at any time. Because appellant was not precluded from raising this issue by way of a motion under 3.800(a), the trial court erred in denying the motion without consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moorer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 8, 1990
556 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Moorer v. State

Case Details

Full title:ASHLEY BRETT MOORER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 8, 1990

Citations

556 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Vanderblomen v. State

State, 634 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Thomas v. State, 611 So.2d 600, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). While…

State v. Mancino

te, 634 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Thomas v. State, 611 So.2d 600, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). While…