Summary
enhancing damages for post-verdict infringement despite defendant's argument that it had a good-faith belief in its appellate positions
Summary of this case from VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.Opinion
2013-1178
2013-09-13
MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INNOLUX CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION) AND INNOLUX CORP., Defendants, AND HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Movant-Appellant.
MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and VINCENT A. GALLO. PETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, and JAY C. CHIU.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0378, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.
JUDGMENT
MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and VINCENT A. GALLO.
PETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, and JAY C. CHIU. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
______________________
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk