From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molino v. Fagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

noting that CPL 710.60 requires a court to set forth on the record its findings of fact, its conclusions of law, and the reasons for its determination

Summary of this case from Dallio v. Spitzer

Opinion

May 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate the judgment entered against him upon his default (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Molino v. Fagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

noting that CPL 710.60 requires a court to set forth on the record its findings of fact, its conclusions of law, and the reasons for its determination

Summary of this case from Dallio v. Spitzer
Case details for

Molino v. Fagan

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MOLINO et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS FAGAN, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 985

Citing Cases

Dearstyne v. Mazzuca

The Court finds that is was objectively erroneous for the Appellate Division to make a credibility…

Dallio v. Spitzer

The Appellate Division initially remanded the case to the trial court "to report its findings of fact and…