From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mireskandari v. Mayne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2016
Case No. CV 12-3861 JGB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016)

Summary

In Mireskandari v. Mayne, 2016 WL 1165896, at *17–20 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016), the district court determined that four individuals who worked for a foreign government were foreign officials acting in their official capacities such that they could assert common law sovereign immunity.

Summary of this case from WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Grp. Techs.

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-3861 JGB (MRWx)

03-23-2016

Shahrokh Mireskandari and Paul Baxendale-Walker, Plaintiffs, v. Barrington Mayne et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

In accordance with the Court's Order filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Dated: March 23, 2016

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mireskandari v. Mayne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2016
Case No. CV 12-3861 JGB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016)

In Mireskandari v. Mayne, 2016 WL 1165896, at *17–20 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016), the district court determined that four individuals who worked for a foreign government were foreign officials acting in their official capacities such that they could assert common law sovereign immunity.

Summary of this case from WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Grp. Techs.
Case details for

Mireskandari v. Mayne

Case Details

Full title:Shahrokh Mireskandari and Paul Baxendale-Walker, Plaintiffs, v. Barrington…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 12-3861 JGB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016)

Citing Cases

WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Grp. Techs.

(emphasis added)). In Mireskandari v. Mayne, 2016 WL 1165896, at *17–20 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2016), the…

C.D.A. v. United States

While other district courts have agreed with the Fourth Circuit's analysis, see, e.g., Mireskandari v.…