From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minor v. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 10, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0036-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 10, 2013)

Summary

granting summary judgment in favor of defendant because plaintiff claimed she was harassed because of her complaints, not her race

Summary of this case from Jarvis v. Gen. Land Office of Tex.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0036-G (BF)

07-10-2013

EILENE T. MINOR, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated June 13, 2013, the court finds that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are accepted as the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

It is further ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all of plaintiff's claims and causes of action.

______________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Minor v. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 10, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0036-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 10, 2013)

granting summary judgment in favor of defendant because plaintiff claimed she was harassed because of her complaints, not her race

Summary of this case from Jarvis v. Gen. Land Office of Tex.

rejecting argument that disparate treatment exists when plaintiff is “generally treated less favorably” than comparators where there was no evidence comparators engaged in nearly identical misconduct

Summary of this case from Moore v. Miss. Dep't of Human Servs.

rejecting argument that disparate treatment exists when plaintiff is "generally treated less favorably" than comparators where there was no evidence comparators engaged in nearly identical misconduct

Summary of this case from Wodi v. Cardinal Health Pharmacy Servs., LLC
Case details for

Minor v. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:EILENE T. MINOR, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0036-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Wodi v. Cardinal Health Pharmacy Servs., LLC

The disparate treatment Wodi alleges is similar to that asserted in Pollak and is likewise insufficient. See…

Tejada v. Travis Assoc. for the Blind

Notwithstanding this, some trial courts have granted summary judgment on the basis that the Fifth Circuit has…