From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Minney v. Winstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 27, 2013
Civil Action No. 2: 12-cv-1732 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2: 12-cv-1732

06-27-2013

ELIZABETH ANNE MINNEY, Petitioner, v. RHODA A. WINSTEAD, Superintendent, Respondent.


Judge Joy Flowers Conti Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) on November 27, 2012, and was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the local rules of court.

On April 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Elizabeth Anne Minney be dismissed and that a Certificate of Appealability be denied. Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation at her listed address and was advised that she had until May 3, 2013 to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12). No objections were filed.

The Court was concerned that Plaintiff may not have received the Report and Recommendation as the inmate number listed on the Court's docket appeared to be incorrect. The Docket reflects that Plaintiff's inmate number is 086484; however, Plaintiff's inmate number on the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Inmate Locator is shown as OS6484.

Therefore, in an abundance of caution, on May 31, 2013, the Court resent the Report and Recommendation and advised Petitioner that she had until June 14, 2013, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13). To date, no objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2013;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Elizabeth Anne Minney (ECF No. 2) is DISMISSED and that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 12) dated April 16, 2013, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

______________________________

Joy Flowers Conti

United States District Judge
cc: ELIZABETH ANNE MINNEY

086484

P.O. Box 180

Muncy, PA 17756

Thomas W. Minett, Esquire

Email: twminett@hotmail.com


Summaries of

Minney v. Winstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 27, 2013
Civil Action No. 2: 12-cv-1732 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Minney v. Winstead

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH ANNE MINNEY, Petitioner, v. RHODA A. WINSTEAD, Superintendent…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 2: 12-cv-1732 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Wunner v. Marsh

A federal habeas court may take judicial notice of state court records. Minney v. Winstead, 2013 WL 3279793,…

Stout v. Ferguson

A federal habeas court may take judicial notice of state court records. Minney v. Winstead, 2013 WL 3279793,…